By | May 20, 2008 - 6:04 pm - Posted in Educationau, google, Twitter

Well… not really but one of the biggest problems that I have with Twitter (which is a great idea) is its reliability. I just experienced not being able to get into it yet again. This follows closely from problems I had yesterday and on what seems like many previous occasions. So why do I mention Google? Basically Google is my Internet health check. It’s just always there - fast and reliable. If I can’t access Google I know I have network problems. Twitter could learn from this commitment to reliability and performance. Either that or someone with the financial might and commitment to performance/reliability should just buy them out and sort it out.

Cheers,

Jerry.

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | May 1, 2008 - 8:57 pm - Posted in Educationau, google, facebook, OpenSocial

From ZDNet comes a post reporting of Google’s CEO pleading to crawl Facebook.  Quoted as saying “If it’s not searchable by Google, it’s not open, and open is best for the consumer,”.  Hmmm, best for the consumer or marketer?  Eric Schmidt is quoted as then going on to say that people should be able to move from place to place on the Web with their data.  I fully support the notion of me being able to do that and am pleased to see the OpenSocial initiative however that is quite different to a site being ‘crawlable’.

Its kind of strange seeing Facebook being portrayed as some sort of champion for protection of people’s data given the way that many Facebook apps work and their past experiences.  Anyway, it would be nice as a user to be able to make that choice myself.  Do I want Google to crawl through my Facebook data or not?  Why should it be the choice of Facebook and/or Google?

technorati tags: Facebook, Google,OpenSocial

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | March 19, 2008 - 7:22 pm - Posted in Educationau, google, standards, OOXML, document freedom

Google, the Internet Society of Australia (ISOC-AU) and the Sydney Linux User’s Group are hosting an event for the first annual Document Freedom day on Wednesday 26th March at the Sydney Google offices. From the document freedom site:

“The Document Freedom Day (DFD) is a global day for Document Liberation with grassroots action for promotion of Free Document Formats and Open Standards in general. The DFD was initiated and is supported by a group of organisations and companies, including, but not limited to the Free Software Foundation Europe, ODF Alliance, OpenForum Europe, IBM, Red Hat and Sun Microsystems, Inc.

On 26 March 2008, the Document Freedom Day will provide a global rallying point for Document Liberation and Open Standards. It will literally give teams around the world the chance to “hoist the flag”:”

For more information about the event in Sydney, see here.

At education.au we are keen to use, showcase and promote open standards in general, but we obviously have a specific interest in those that affect or can be utilised within education. This event in particular is well timed in terms of what is happening at the moment with open document formats and the standardisation process. Many will have heard about OOXML and possibly the fast tracking of the Draft International Standard 29500. However, if you are not, simply try googling OOXML. The debate over this issue is intense, to say the least. Trying to find an unbiased view can be challenging. Here are a couple of links that are worth reading but as with anything that is written, are written through the eyes of the writers/contributors.

Cheers,

Jerry

technorati tags: document freedom day, OOXML,Google

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | March 16, 2008 - 3:49 am - Posted in Educationau, google

Here’s another nice service from Google if for some reason you aren’t able to run Google Earth on your desktop (not in the SOE or something like that) and would like to search and view some of images that ‘Sky in Google Earth’ offers. Google Sky puts all this into your browser. The Hubble Showcase alone is really worth checking out. Happy viewing!

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | - 12:07 am - Posted in Educationau, google, innovation

It’s always good to look at successful organisations and try to learn from some of their practices/experience. Some time ago we looked at Google and their ‘20% time’ for engineers. Google engineers are encouraged to spend 20% of their time free to work on what they are really passionate about. As well as hopefully making Google a better place to work for their engineers (not that it would have been that bad any way!) a number of successful Google products have emerged as a result of this initiative.

I recently attended a ‘breakfast seminar’ where Mike Cannon-Brookes of Atlassian talked about his company. Atlassian have just started a 20% time trial of their own. On the Atlassian blog you can find out all the details of this trial, how it works, why they are doing it etc but what is really interesting is the open and very public approach they are taking with it. Atlassian staff are being encouraged to blog everything about the trial, what works, what doesn’t, how they feel about it etc. While we know about Google’s 20% time and what some of the products that have emerged from it are, Mike argues we don’t really know much about how it works in practice. Atlassian are going to find out for themselves and let the world know through their blog. This will be very interesting to follow and I look forward to seeing the blog posts appearing in their developer blog.

Atlassian estimate that their trial is going to cost US$1,000,000 - a serious investment given the size of their company. At education.au we have quite a number of software engineers and it would be great to adopt this sort of practice as well. In addition to software engineers we have quite a number of professionals from Education and Training who, if given 20% of their time to devote to something they are passionate about, would no doubt end up adding a lot of value to our company. The reality of course for us is that quite simply, this is not going to happen. We are not in a position to do something like this but what sort of organisations are? Take Google and Atlassian for example. Both are successful technology companies that have the financial capacity to implement such programs. One is publicly listed and one is private. Is it feasible or even acceptable for say, not for profit organisations or government departments to try similar programs? How about other professions and trades? Surely software engineers are not the only ones who can benefit from and add value back to their organisations and customers through such initiatives. Think about your job for a moment - what could you do if you were given a day a week to do something related to your work that you are passionate about and what sort of benefits would ultimately come back to your organisation and its customers?

The ‘catch 22′ for me is that in order for us to be in a position to do this, we would already had to have done it successfully and be reaping the benefits to be in a position to do it!

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

From TechCrunch the news that Apple is making a number of announcements today for the iPhone. Support for Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync is a big one on its own. I can just imagine the groans from IT/finance departments in organisations around the world (not here in Australia yet as we don’t have the iPhone - but that’s another story) who now have to deal with requests for iPhones in their companies. The other big news is Apple opening up its internal APIs and tools to 3rd party developers. A software developers kit (SDK) is available for writing apps on both the iPhone and iTouch (at least we have those here) at a price of US$99. The TechCrunch article describes some interesting application demos that are worth checking out. Applications that are developed will only be distributed through iTunes and while I am a fan of their technologies, I can’t really say the same about some of their business models.

So - what does this mean for those of us in the (Australian) education space…. Well we don’t have iPhones yet which kind of takes the shine off any such announcements but as developers of niche services in a niche market, we really have to ask ourselves whether this mobile platform is one that we can afford to develop in or should we concentrate on more open and widely adopted mobile technologies (no matter how cool the iPhone looks). It is interesting to see this announcement in the same week that Google announced Google Gears for Mobile though. What was interesting for me about that announcement was that it will initially be available for Internet Explorer Mobile on Windows Mobile devices.

technorati tags: iPhone,

Google Gears

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | December 16, 2007 - 10:26 pm - Posted in Educationau, google, knol

Yet another interesting announcement from Google. It seems they are about to launch a new tool called knol. A knol is a ‘unit of knowledge’ and the service aims to encourage anyone who is ‘expert’ in something to write an article about it. According to Google the service aims to highlight authors and I guess help create or enhance their reputation. At the moment they are doing some limited trials by invitation only. From its description it sounds like it could be a great tool for educators and learners alike. It will be interesting to see how successful it becomes.

technorati tags: Google,
knol

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | November 30, 2007 - 2:59 am - Posted in Educationau, google, privacy

Google Street view recently arrived in Australia and is already encountering interesting opinions on privacy in particular. Google Earth and Google Maps are great services already but it certainly does add an extra dimension when you are able to look at a location (360 degrees too) from street level. Of course at street level is where you will find all sorts of people engaged in all sorts of activity who may or may not want to be photographed. This is where privacy advocates are concerned. Do a Google search on Google Street View and you can find a number of articles discussing examples of where,how or when you might not want to be photographed for the world to see.
What interests me though is not so much the discussion (interesting as it is) of Google Street View now but what it may look like and how it could be used in the future. Photos are a natural precursor to video so how long is it before Street View or something like it starts using video. There are countless numbers of webcams and video surveillance in our cities now. If you really want a street view to add an extra dimension to Google Earth/Maps why not integrate these into the service.
What could you use such a service for? Obviously its great for real estate services, previewing where you might go on holidays etc and could be a great educational resource.
How about some other uses? There should be some great mashup opportunities here. Since privacy has been raised as a concern where could this go? Well, a number of social networking services I use have presence awareness so they know when I am online. I can probably be tracked down to a general area using an IP address. So, if you know my identity, that I am online and where I am online at, if there is a webcam or some sort of accessible video surveillance nearby, theoretically it may be possible for you to do a search on me and then click to some sort of video where you can see me, without me knowing it or giving any sort of permission to do so. Is this a good or a bad thing?
What if I am not online? I may be carrying my mobile phone with me. Mobiles can supposedly be located easily enough so its probably theoretically possible to track me down to a location using that technology. Of course there are other ways that I can be tracked down which I discussed briefly here. Its interesting to speculate just what sort of services could be available in the next 5 or 10 years and just how powerful and accessible technology is becoming.

Cheers,
Jerry.

technorati tags: Google, Google Street View,privacyl

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By | November 14, 2007 - 3:43 am - Posted in Educationau, e-portfolio, google, OpenSocial

In an earlier post I asked whether Google could be my ePortfolio. While I can find out quite a bit about me and other people who share my name using a Google search, its not really an ePortfolio application (then again, what is?).

As a participant in a number of social networking services, I have content about me in potentially many of them that would be useful for inclusion into some form of ePortfolio. One of the frustrations that I have is how to combine content from a number of places that I would find useful into some sort of personal portfolio platform. Many services have their own interfaces that are inconsistent with others. Each service that I want to interact with is accessed in a different manner.

Now along comes OpenSocial from Google. OpenSocial specifies a common set of interfaces for accessing social networking applications. The number of services that are listed as committed to it is impressive. Services such as LinkedIn, Hi5, Plaxo, imeem, slide, MySpace to name a few are all in there. Each of these services could provide an interesting component of my ePortfolio. Having a common set of interfaces should simplify the task of developing an aggregate platform for ePortfolios. Combining this with institutional or systemic ePortfolio implementations would be really useful.

technorati tags: Google, ePortfolio,OpenSocial

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back

By a | June 8, 2007 - 12:16 am - Posted in Educationau, Web 2.0, social networking, e-portfolio, google

ePortfolios have been around for a long time now and the range and diversity of ePortfolio implementations is, well, staggering. There are a lot of commercial software offerings and most eLearning platforms seem to have a portfolio component. Large numbers of schools, training organisations and higher education organisations have developed their own and some of the larger ones have multiple eportfolio implementations. Some of these are great, particularly while you are engaged with that institution. Some allow you access to your/their portfolio (of you) for a long time after you leave, although who actually owns ‘your’ portfolio could be problematic.

It could be, and is often, argued that many of these ‘formal’ eportfolios do not meet all the requirements of their user base. Take a look at the rich information hundreds of thousands of Internet users are pouring into social networking services daily. Many Internet users would be quite comfortable with the notion that their myspace presence or similar service serves them well as their ePortfolio. Blogs make excellent (components of) eportfolios. Linked to your FLickr account, Facebook and dozens of other Web 2.0 services, you can create a very compelling Eportfolio of yourself. Which of these services should you or could you use? You might be able to find out information about me through Facebook, pageflakes, Windows Live spaces, several personal blogs, flickr, our company blog, Zoominfo, maybe even a myspace account, my EuroPass resume, and any one of dozens of Web 2.0 services I have reviewed over the last 12 months or so. None of these presences have been populated by me to serve as an ePortfolio but it is entirely reasonable that they could have.
Some services, such as ZoomInfo aren’t even maintained by me and are at best, very incomplete, at worst, wildly inaccurate. If I do a ‘vanity’ search on Google, I can find references to me on other services too, along with papers, presentations that I have delivered at conferences and all sorts of other ‘portfolio’ related information. Fortunately (?) for me, I have a relatively uncommon name. However, what if my name were ‘John Smith’, a reasonably common Western name. Trying to sift through Internet content that is ‘me’ would be a nightmare - even coupled with location and time based information it could still be very difficult.
Another problem for me is that I only seem to have existed for a few years - at least on the Internet. For those of us young enough to have grown up in the Internet era this may not be so much of a problem but many of us have done some pretty interesting stuff, that would be valuable for potential employers to know about, a long time before we started publishing it on the Web. I guess that is just another illustration of the radical change we are undergoing as a result of the Web - some of us existed prior to this change as well as existing during it.
For a portfolio service to be valuable to me, I need to be able to store, or refer/link to all sorts of content that may reside locally or on a wide variety of services. I need to be confident that the content will be available and accessible for a long period of time. I would like to present this content, or parts of it, in any number of formats/layouts to different audiences at different periods of time. It is about me so I would like to have some naive notion that I have a semblance of control over what it contains, how it looks, who can see different parts of it and when. Importantly, I would also like to refer to authenticated information about my achievements from time to time. An example would be proof that I completed a degree at a specific University. Of course, this is just one component of an eportfolio. In addition to providing evidence, artefacts, etc, I may also like to use it as a learning tool which means I would like a range of other services to be aggregated, or available at a single place of my convenience using whatever device I feel like at whatever time. I may like to reflect on what I am learning and other experiences or use my portfolio for planning too. This brings to mind a number of tools that I am using at the moment with Google’s increasingly large range of services.
So where does this leave me. To date I have a number of great services that I would like to incorporate into my ePortfolio space but I would also love to be able to link in authenticated, validated content from education/training organisations as proof of some of my achievements.

Cheers.

technorati tags:

Original post by jleeson and software by Elliott Back